Summarizing handball rules

The "chokehold" suggests more than minimal contact, perhaps indicating a red card. In handball cases, modern laws state that an unnatural arm position can penalize a player even if the ball deflects off their body, unless it's an unexpected deflection. According to IFAB's 2024/25 changes, any handball leading directly to a goal by the player is now a penalty, but accidental handballs in the build-up are not. I’ll structure a response that examines the law, how VAR handles it, and other relevant factors.Crafting a match overview

I should ask the user if they want clips or time stamps, though I can't access the network unless they request it. Keeping my response concise but helpful is key. The guidelines suggest using bullet points and a friendly tone. I'll provide a quick overview of the match and officials; however, if I can't confirm details, I'll avoid naming specifics while seeing if the user can provide date context. Their prompt suggests they want an analysis, so I need to focus on that.Providing key penalty review

Here are the bullet points for "关键判罚回顾":

1. Regarding Semenyo's action of "锁喉," a yellow card was issued. Per law 12, violent conduct involving contact to the neck is high-risk. Factors include force, speed, intent, and context. Though this typically warrants a red card, VAR can upgrade to red if there’s clear and obvious violent conduct. An upgrade might not happen due to low force, grappling, or good referee positioning that doesn’t indicate a clear infraction.

   

2. For suspected handballs, here are the scenarios:

• A blocked cross or shot with an arm extended laterally is likely a penalty.
• An arm close to the body when falling usually isn't penalized.
• If a ball is deflected from close range onto the arm, it tends to not be penalized unless the arm is clearly extended.
• For attackers, a handball in the attacking phase is only a penalty if it leads directly to a goal or possession; otherwise, it’s generally seen as accidental.Explaining VAR lines

For VAR lines, it's crucial to have a conclusive camera angle. If the ball lightly brushes the upper shoulder (within the T-shirt line), it’s considered legal. The term "multiple" suggests we could reference times like 8', 34', or 77', but we need to be cautious since we can’t guess exact times. I can present a method: if the user provides timestamps, I can offer a verdict.

For incidents like a handball, if the arm is away from the body, at least one seems penalizable, while the others are borderline. I should also mention the Premier League's 2024-25 guidelines, which raise the threshold for penalizing soft handballs.Crafting a review of controversial penalties

• Title: 争议判罚回顾

• Bullet points:

  • 关键事件1：塞梅尼奥的“锁喉”仅得黄牌

    

    • 规则要点
    • VAR介入标准
    • 合理解释/反驳
    • 个人判定

  • 关键事件2：疑似多次手球

    • 规则要点（防守、进攻、肩部界线、折射/距离、支撑手）
    • VAR标准
    • 可能未判或应判原因
    • 建议回看要点（肢体位置、击球点、球路改变等）

• 总结：整体尺度与英超近年倾向，期望一致性

• 邀请：如果你有时间点或动图，我可以做逐球判断。